Author: 033524969956208

  • ASUU Strike: FG Ready To Renegotiate ASUU Agreement

    ASUU Strike: FG Ready To Renegotiate ASUU Agreement

    The Federal Government on Monday inaugurated a seven-person committee tasked with the renegotiation of the 2009 agreement reached with the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU).

    The committee is chaired by Pro-Chancellor, Alex Ekweme Federal University Ndufu-Alike, Emeritus Professor Nimi Briggs.

    Other members are Pro-Chancellor, Federal University, Wukari, Arc. Lawrence Patrick Ngbale, who represents North East; Pro-Chancellor, Federal University, Birnin Kebbi, Prof. Funmi Togunu-Bickersteth, representing South West and Pro-Chancellor, Federal University, Lokoja, Senator Chris Adighije, representing South East.

    Also on the team are Pro-Chancellor, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Prof. Olu Obafemi from North-Central; Pro-Chancellor, Kano State University of Science & Technology, Prof. Zubairu Iliyasu, representing North West; and Pro-Chancellor, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Mathew Seiyefa from South-South.

    The academics are seeking improved welfare, revitalisation of public universities and academic autonomy among other demands. ASUU is currently on a one-month warning strike which commenced on February 14.

    The Committee, which is expected to review the draft proposed FGN/ASUU Agreement, has the following Terms of Reference:

    a. Liaise and consult with relevant stakeholders to finalise the position of the Federal Government to the issues in the draft proposed FGN/ASUU Renegotiated Agreement;

    b. Renegotiate in realistic and workable terms the 2009 Agreements with other University-Based Unions;

    c. Negotiate and recommend any other issue the Committee deems relevant to reposition the NUS for global competitiveness; and

    d. Submit proposed draft agreements within three (3) months from the date of inauguration.


    One of the points of negotiation will be the non-payment of university revitalisation funds, which amounts to about N1.1 trillion.

    The agreement was reportedly struck in 2009.

    But the Minister of Labour and Employment, Chris Ngige, has maintained that the Federal Government doesn’t have the money to pay such an amount, citing low oil prices during the Muhammadu Buhari administration.

    “In 2016/2017 government said it doesn’t have the money,” Mr Ngige said on Channels Television’s Politics Today last week. “But we will find a way by which we can fund the universities. So, a committee was set up with ASUU as members.”

    According to Mr Ngige, the committee “couldn’t come up with anything that could generate funds.

    “The committee even recommended that stamp duty should be taken. There was a proposal to get money from phone charges. Government made it clear that we don’t have the 1.1 trillion that is remaining.”

    According to Mr Ngige, the Federal Government has dealt with most of ASUU’s demands.

    “A lot of them have been dealt with after our meeting in October last year,” he said.

    “That’s why I said I was shocked they went on strike.

    “The only place where they have a point to hold onto and do their strike is on the issue of renegotiation of 2009 – conditions of service, because their conditions of service was supposed to be reviewed.”

    The Minister noted that the academics have produced an interim report on conditions of service which was rejected by the National Salaries, Incomes & Wages Commission (NSIWC).

    “Because the things they have in there, in terms of allowances, were contrary to existing extant financial regulations,” he said.

    Mr Ngige said he was hopeful the academics will call of their strike soon so that students can return to the classroom.

    The committee has three months to conclude their renegotiation. Thereby, ASUU might extend their warning strike till Federal government are ready to fulfil their demands.

  • Russia-Ukraine Conflict: What It Means For Africa, and Nigeria

    Russia-Ukraine Conflict: What It Means For Africa, and Nigeria


    On 21 February 2022, the Russian Federation Council unanimously authorised Putin to use military force outside Russia’s borders. Two days later, Russia launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine, its neighbour to the southwest, marking a dramatic escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that began in 2014.

    Putinin announced a ‘special military operation’ in eastern Ukraine; minutes later, missiles began to hit locations across Ukraine, including the capital, Kyiv. What does this mean to Africa and Nigeria?

    Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a military operation in Ukraine early Thursday, which began with a series of missile attacks and the use of long-range artillery. It quickly spread across central and eastern Ukraine as Russian forces attacked the country from three sides.

    President Putin has frequently accused Ukraine of being taken over by extremists ever since its pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych, was ousted in 2014 after months of protests against his rule.

    Russia then retaliated by seizing the southern region of Crimea and triggering a rebellion in the east, backing separatists who have fought Ukrainian forces in a war that has claimed 14,000 lives. Late in 2021, Russia began deploying big numbers of troops close to Ukraine’s borders, while repeatedly denying it was going to attack then Mr Putin scrapped a 2015 peace deal for the east and recognised areas under rebel control as an independent.

    Russia has long resisted Ukraine’s move towards joining the European Union and the West’s defensive military alliance, NATO. Announcing Russia’s invasion, he accused NATO of threatening “our historic future as a nation”. Putin does not want his neighbouring country to join his enemies as he feels threatened by the western romance towards Ukraine.

    Dangerous For Africa?

    Despite the geographical distance, there are important ties between Ukraine and Africa, including more than 8,000 Moroccans and 4,000 Nigerians studying in Ukraine and over $4 billion in exports from Ukraine to Africa.

    Although some African countries may benefit from a shift in global markets away from Russia due to the crisis, the short-term potential impacts on economic livelihoods are worrying while the implications for pan-African solidarity and adherence to multilateralism are increasingly uncertain.

    A few countries are sensing long-term growth opportunities from the crisis. Specifically, Africa’s natural gas could reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian energy.
    Several other countries could similarly benefit from Europe’s energy diversification, including Senegal, where 40 trillion cubic feet of natural gas were discovered between 2014 and 2017 and where production is expected to start later this year.

    Nigeria, already a supplier of liquified natural gas (LNG) to several European countries, is also embarking with Niger and Algeria on the Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline to increase exports of natural gas to European markets.

    Despite these possibilities, in the near term, the invasion of Ukraine could pose hardships for African households, the agricultural sector, and food security. The rising price of oil on global markets induced by the crisis in Europe will have a direct impact on the cost of transport. Economists have warned that the war in Ukraine could further push oil prices up and increase inflation in Africa.

    What does it mean for Nigeria?
    The Nigerian government on Thursday said it has received surprise reports of the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. The West African Country, however, did not condemn the Russia invasion unlike many countries like the U.S.A and the NATO allies have condemned the invasion and imposed sanctions on Russia.

    Nigeria’s stance that Russia’s attacks are targeting only military installations in Ukraine. However, Nigeria’s federal government posits that it was willing to evacuate its citizens from Ukraine.

    The Federal Government has met with envoys of the G7 countries in Nigeria, expressing worries over the Russian-Ukraine conflict with a call for peace to resolve the conflict.

    Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama, met with the envoys on Friday in Abuja, saying that the Nigerian government called for peace and the use of diplomacy in resolving all differences.

    Onyeama said Nigeria does not condone the approach of aggression by Russia, calling on Russia to pull back.

    Russia has played an increasing role on the African continent in diverse ways. Trade, aid, military training and paramilitary security. the future of this long-lasting relationship will be tested by the current crisis between Russia and Ukraine.

    On Wednesday morning, the Minister of State Petroleum Resouces, Timipre Sylva, was queried by a Bloomberg reporter if Nigeria can heed to the calls from the United States on replacing Russia’s gas once sanctions begin to take place. The Honourable Minister responded by saying he was not privy to that conversation and reiterated that Nigeria does not have the infrastructure for that gas distribution. Herein lies the missed opportunity. Nigeria makes up the top 10 countries with the largest gas reserves in the world, and as reported late last year, the Nigerian government discovered 206 trillion cubic feet of gas accidentally while searching for oil.

    Nigeria has failed to live up to its title as the Giant of Africa and the Largest Oil producer in Africa. The country has missed out on oil earnings because of underperforming production capacity. Joe Biden is not expected to target Russia’s crude oil and refined fuel sector with sanctions due to concerns about inflation and harm it could do to its European allies and oil markets.

    The recognition of breakaway parts in Ukraine would bring light to Biafra agitation that has rocked Nigeria for a couple of years now. IPOB’s consistent calls for separation have seen different “mini-government’s in the South-Eastern states. It’s been reported that there are unauthorized stay-at-home orders in solidarity with the separation calls. The growing secession movement would affect the sovereignty and legitimacy of the Nigerian government as we have seen in Ukraine.

    How Being a Pan-African Hurts?

    Finally, while most attention has focused on the implications of this crisis for trans-Atlantic relations and NATO unity, the invasion of Ukraine presents a significant test of the concept of pan-African solidarity and regionalism. In recent months, the set of institutions intended to represent this solidarity from the African Union (AU) to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) as well as the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have been undermined by conflicting views among heads of state over how to handle the spate of coups in the Sahel and rising insurgency across the continent.

    More generally though, the conflict has put many African leaders in a difficult position and attempting to forge a neutral position. South Africa’s neutrality had for weeks frustrated EU and Ukrainian diplomats who nonetheless recognize its special role with Russia via the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) grouping of middle-income countries. Only after the invasion on Thursday did the South African government finally take a stronger stance, calling for Russia to withdraw its forces. Significantly, the Nigerian government only noted its surprise about the invasion but neither condemned it nor called for a cessation of hostilities.

    More broadly, African governments have shown growing interest in building relationships with both the West and the East in order to diversify trade, investment, and aid options. Russia has reasserted itself in recent years through both security and economic influence on the continent. China, which appears to have tacitly condoned the invasion, has of course been a major presence in the region for the last decade, investing close to $3 billion in 2021 alone.

    There is minimal interest in returning to an era when African leaders needed to show allegiances to a Cold War power.

    Yet, given the outright invasion of Ukraine and the violation of international law, the key question now is how African governments will maintain their relationships with their diverse set of external partners and with one another as the geopolitical context dramatically shifts.

  • FIFA Names Bayern Star, Lewandowski as Best Men’s Player

    Bayern Munich and Poland International Star Player Robert Lewandowski has bagged the award for the FIFA Men’s Player of the Year Award for the second time in a row beating Liverpool Star Mohammed Salah and Paris St Germain Star Lionel Messi.

    Robert Lewandowski had an amazing season all through breaking the late Gerad Muller 49 year old record for scoring the most goals in the Bundesliga in a calendar year with 43 goals in 34 appearances.

    Lewandowski, 33, won the FIFA Club World Cup with the German giants early in 2021, followed by another Bundesliga title. He was also pivotal in his country’s World Cup qualifying campaign, scoring eight goals in as many games.

    Also, Manchester United Star Christiano Ronaldo was given a special award at the FIFA Awards for being the all time men international goal scorer. While two-time men’s winner Ronaldo was given the special award and included in the best XI, the Portugal captain was omitted from the shortlist for the individual prize for the first time since its inception.

    Men’s world XI: Gianluigi Donnarumma (AC Milan/PSG/Italy), David Alaba (Bayern Munich/Real Madrid/Austria), Leonardo Bonucci (Juventus/Italy), Ruben Dias (Man City/Portugal), Kevin de Bruyne (Man City/Belgium), Jorginho (Chelsea/Italy), N’Golo Kante (Chelsea/France), Cristiano Ronaldo (Juventus/Man Utd/Portugal), Erling Braut Haaland (Borussia Dortmund/Norway), Robert Lewandowski (Bayern Munich/Poland), Lionel Messi (Barcelona/PSG/Argentina)

  • NANS LAUDS LAGOS STATE GOVERNMENT, FROWNS AT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE STATEMENT

    NANS LAUDS LAGOS STATE GOVERNMENT, FROWNS AT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE STATEMENT

    The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) investigative committee on Sylvester’s death commended the Lagos State Government for removing Ms Adetutu Oshinusi from the office of Director of Public Prosecution.

    Recall that, Oshinusi had in her recommendation to the police on the matter on Tuesday called for the release of the Dowen staff and students suspected to have a hand in circumstances leading to the death of Oromoni, insisting that autopsy result showed that the victim died of infection and not as a result of being physically tortured as claimed by family members.

    NANS in a statement said, “The Lagos State Government should equally make frantic efforts to educate the Lagos Police boss, Hakeem Odumosu, to avoid making statements contradictory to obvious facts.”

    Oladimeji Uthman, Chairman NANS Investigative Committee said “We equally want to reiterate that NANS is an umbrella body for all Nigerian students (Nursery to Tertiary institution), home and in the diaspora. If you feel attacked by our efforts to protect the right and seek justice of our very own Sylvester, then it is glaring who the enemy of justice is. We will not leave any stone unturned. We will keep making findings and call out whosoever that is trying to repress justice, big or small, low or in high places.”

    NANS urge the Parents of Late Sylvester Oromoni Jnr and Dowen college, to release the medical records of Sylvester Oromoni jr before his demise. This is important as it would shed more light on ongoing investigations.

    The committee vow not to stop pursuing justice for the late Sylvester and equally exposing the rot in the system.

  • Uzodimma Fails To Unveil Names of Sponsors of Insecurity in Imo

    Uzodimma Fails To Unveil Names of Sponsors of Insecurity in Imo

    Imo state governor, Senator Hope Uzodimma on Tuesday failed to keep to his ‘open promise’ to unveil the names of sponsors of insecurity in the state, as against the promise openly made to Imolites a couple of days ago.

    Uzodimma who made the gentleman promise while delivering a speech at the government house in Owerri, during the Imo state stakeholders meeting/luncheon.

    Uzodimma also appealed to the former governor of Imo state and the Senator representing Imo West Senatorial district, Rochas Okorocha, to allow him to rule Imo state in peace.

    He said he would allow the security agencies to finish up their investigation and also allow them to reveal the sponsors of insecurity in the state.

    In his latest speech, he said, “Let us allow the security agencies to finish their investigation and reveal the names of the sponsors of insecurity and they will be arrested.”

    He stated further that, “The difference between former Governor Okorocha and others who have ruled this state was that he wants to be the governor when he is out of office. Okorocha is the only governor that wants to take this state alone for himself. He should allow me to rule this state as the governor, I am his elder brother and I deserve some respect from him. We cannot allow one person to hold this state hostage.”

  • 2023:Osinbajo Ready to Run For President

    By Samuel Agbelusi

    The Presidency is said to be ready for an interesting political event as Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo has informed his principal, President Muhammadu Buhari of his intention to run for the apex political seat in 2023. This however has put the president in a situation that looks dim.

    Vice President Osinbajo’s intention came when he met with President Buhari on New Year’s Day with the mindset that his ambition will consolidate on his achievements according to three administration officials familiar with the development.

    “The Vice-President did not want to go into the election year by hiding a plan which the president had probably already known about,” a national security aide told The Gazette on Monday night under anonymity because the parley was not approved for public consumption. “He knew that an immediate endorsement of the president, on the other hand, may not be so easy to come by.”

    Vice President Yemi Osinbajo said he was not looking to ambush or forced the president into endorsing him and has long acknowledged that it might take a while to be on the president’s support, according to the official who was present at the meeting.

    Vice President Osinbajo, 64, will likely run as president due to his credentials that have better qualities and sellable than Mr Buhari. He received accolades when he briefly acted as president in 2017 as President Buhari was receiving treatment abroad for nagging ear infections and and other complications that remained undisclosed. He was seen as a unifying figure when he led the country for a few months that year.

  • Governor to name sponsors of Insecurity crises on Tuesday

    Imo State Executive Governor Hope Uzodimma will on Tuesday(Today) name those behind the spate of insecurity in the state.

    Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Declan Emelumba, stated this in a statement on Sunday.

    He said the governor will use the occasion and gathering of the sixth edition of Imo stakeholders forum to name those who are sponsors and financiers of insecurity in the state.

    According to the commissioner, the government is in possession of evidence of the involvement of those responsible for the carnage and crisis and they will be brought to book.

    Emelumba said apart from the public being availed of the individuals, the governor will update Imo people on his performance in the last two years.

    He said the stakeholders meeting/luncheon will hold on Tuesday at the Government House at noon, and not at the Ahiajoku Convention Centre, Owerri.

  • Sudan coup: Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok resigns after mass protests

    Sudan’s Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok has resigned after another day of mass protests that paralyse activities in the nation’s capital, Khartoum.

    Thousands of aggrieved Sudanese who were not happy with the prime minister marched against a recent deal he had done to share power with the army, who staged a coup in October.

    Chanting “power to the people”, protesters called for a return to full civilian rule. But military forces again responded with force, leaving two people dead as the protesters were not ready to back down their demands.

    Mr Hamdok’s decision to quit leaves the army in full control of the government. It is another blow to Sudan’s fragile attempts at a transition to democratic rule after a popular uprising led to the overthrow of Sudan’s long-term authoritarian President Omar al-Bashir in 2019.

    In a televised address, Mr Hamdok said the country was at a “dangerous turning point that threatens its whole survival”. He said he had tried his best to stop the country from “sliding towards disaster”, but that “despite everything that has been done to reach a consensus… it has not happened”.

    Civilian and military leaders had made an uneasy power-sharing agreement after the army staged a coup on 25 October and initially placed Prime Minister Hamdok under house arrest.

    The country was just one month away from transition to a civilian head of state when the army seized power.

    Mr Hamdok, an economist by training, is widely respected in the international community having previously worked as an official with the United Nations. He helped negotiate a deal to forgive some of Sudan’s debts but this involved removing fuel subsidies, leading the prices of many basic goods to rise, and to anti-government protests.

    Under the agreement reached with Mr Hamdok in November, the reinstated prime minister was supposed to lead a cabinet of technocrats until elections were held. But it was unclear how much power the new civilian government would have, and protests against the military resumed, which were often violently suppressed. Protests continued even after Mr Hamdok had returned to office, with some demonstrators saying that his reinstatement was helping to legitimatise the military takeover.

    The United Nations’ special representative in Sudan has expressed regret over Mr Hamdok’s resignation.

    The resignation of Mr Hamdok showed the military was losing their opportunity to get international recognition, according to a spokesman for the opposition Sudanese Congress Party.